The Boston/New York face-off in the Super Bowl got me thinking about Portland in relation to those two urban centers of gravity. Many creative professionals here maintain ongoing ties with one or both, and culturally they are quite distinct. Although I've lived here for seven years—and although I'm not a sports fan—I find myself rooting for the Giants. Ex-New Yorkers can even think that their urbanity has had a pervasive effect on Portland, but in truth, Portland has probably changed them more than they have changed Portland. To get to the bottom of this struggle for identity—this battle for the soul of Portland—I consulted Colin Woodard, author of American Nations. And like many New Yorkers before me, I tried to change his New England mind and he ended up changing mine.

Q:What is the theory behind American Nations and which Nation is the City of Portland part of?

A: American Nations argues that there has never been one America, but rather several Americas. The original colonial clusters were founded by people with distinct ethnographic and religious characteristics, ideals, values, and political and societal goals. Throughout the colonial period they saw each other as competitors and sometimes as enemies, fighting on opposite sides of the English Civil War and the American Revolution. They colonized mutually exclusive portions of the middle region of our continent, laying down the cultural DNA that subsequent immigrants have confronted as the "dominant culture" around them.

Maine, including Portland, is part of Yankeedom, the Greater New England cultural space established by the early Puritans.

Q: The Super Bowl on Sunday pits the New England Patriots (representatives of Yankeedom) against the New York Giants. What "Nation" do the Giants represent?

A: New Netherland, the Dutch-founded area around New York City, to include northern New Jersey, western Long Island, Westchester and Fairfield counties. Established by the Dutch at a time when the Netherlands was the most sophisticated society in the Western world, New Netherland has displayed its salient characteristics throughout its history: a global commercial trading culture— multiethnic, multireligious, and materialistic—with a profound tolerance for diversity and an unflinching commitment to the freedom of inquiry and conscience.

Q: Portland has become multiethnic, multireligious and tolerant of diversity (not sure about materialistic) due to the influx of Africans, Asians—and New Yorkers. Plus we have great bagels, a tattoo parlor from Brooklyn, and lots of first-rate writers and other creatives that have moved here from New York. As an ex-New Yorker myself, I have to ask, what does it take to overthrow the "dominant culture" of a city?

A: All that could be said of Boston, Arlington, Charleston or, indeed, London. Don't confuse the trappings of contemporary urbanity with "New Netherlandishness." Portland's food, art, and culture scenes  owe their existence to transplants from many places, including Massachusetts, New Hampshire and other parts of Maine. That's not to say New Yorkers haven't enriched our city, but one can overestimate their contribution.

The dominant culture in Portland has been Yankee ever since the Casco Bay area was first colonized in the 1650s, the decade after the English Civil War. While New Netherlanders have much to be proud of, there are important virtues of this Yankee culture. There's an emphasis on community -- rather than individual -- good, and a strong social taboo regarding flashy displays of wealth, privilege, and power that is almost entirely alien to Gotham. There is, indeed, an emphasis on cultural conformity -- at some level, Yankee culture expects outsiders to melt into the pot, as it were -- but its also a culture programmed by the Puritans to improve itself through civic institutions and engagement.

Many affluent, big city professionals have who've come and helped invigorate our city have builtupon foundations laid decades and, in some respects, centuries ago. It would be a mistake to assume that Yankees - and indeed, Mainers -- haven't played a central role in the creation of contemporary Portland. (I point your readers to one of my previous works, The Lobster Coast, for more on this.) In short, you wouldn't want to overthrow the dominant culture of Greater Portland. It's what makes the city work in the first place.

Q: So you think that urbanites from New York and all the other metros are attracted to Portland in good measure because of the qualities of Yankeedom—emphasis on community, lack of materialism, value on civic engagement—that are expressed in here? And all that New Netherlandish stuff are just superficial trappings that have—in fact—embedded themselves in many metros without changing the essential character of those places?

A: Urbanites are drawn to Portland for many of the reasons pointed out in your website. Every "nation" has cities with different characteristics and attributes (compare and contrast Paris and Marseilles, for instance), but the dominant culture does have a powerful background effect. So, yes, there are Yankee cultural features at the foundation of what people celebrate about Portland.  New Netherlanders -- and Left Coasters, Midlanders, Irish, French, Greeks, Serbs and Somalis -- have enriched our city, but the dominant culture remains. That, indeed, is why we call it "dominant."

Q: Point taken. So who do you think will win the Super Bowl?

The Patriots. (Where's that other team from? Unlike the Mets and Knickerbockers, their team colors aren't the orange blue and white of the old Dutch Republic.)

Tags: community, diversity, live in portland, politics, relocation, sports